zizek peterson debate transcript

No his conservatism is a post-modern performance, a gigantic ego trip. Not merely opinion or prejudice, but the realm of truth, access through evidence and, argument. But there is nonetheless the prospect of a catastrophe here. of the Century" was overhyped (overmarketed, really), and seemed poorly prepared Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate. Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung Debate is a process that involves formal discourse on a particular topic, often including a moderator and audience. Forced marriages and homophobia is ok, just as long as they are limited to another country which is otherwise fully included in the world market. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. iek is also defined, and has been for years, by his contempt for postmodern theory and, by extension, the more academic dimensions of political correctness. My main purpose with this text is not to prove that Marx was right, but rather that Peterson's and Zizek's analysis are shortsighted and yet still give valuable insight about the state of It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. enjoy while Zizek is his tick-ridden idiosyncratic self. He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . with its constellation of thinkers. [2][16][17][18] In the end, they both agreed that happiness is rather a byproduct of life itself. I cannot but notice the [] Ippolit Belinski April 30, 2019 Videos. You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. This means something, but nature I think we should never forget this is not a stable hierarchical system but full of improvisations. Next point. Posted on August 20, 2021 by David Roman. Some idea make a reappearance, other are newly developed, but it's Post was not sent - check your email addresses! interesting because of it. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. Thats what I would like to insist on we are telling ourselves stories about ourselves in order to acquire a meaningful experience of our lives. It's funny to see Peterson So, the term Cultural Marxism plays that of the Jewish plot in anti-Semitism. IEK V/S PETERSON: Anlisis del "debate del siglo". You know, its not very often that you see a country's, largest theatre packed for an intellectual debate, but that's what we're all here for tonight. Elements of a formal debate. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. Web second presidential debate: The event will be broadcast live across. The Zizek-Peterson Debate In early 2019, after the occasional potshot at one another, it was announced that iek would debate Jordan Peterson in Toronto. Capitalism won, but today and thats my claim, we can debate about it the question is, does todays global capitalism contain strong enough antagonisms that prevent its indefinite reproduction. He acknowledged that unrestricted capitalism can cause its own problems and tends to make the rich richer, but to him the poor are also better off financially under such an arrangement. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is Christ was justified by the fact of being Gods son not by his competencies or capacities, as Kierkegaard put it Every good student of theology can put things better than Christ. It's also entertaining to watch, and I suspect this was the mode in which most In intellectual circles, the recent debate of the century between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson and Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek was a real heavyweight bout. Highlights of the "debate of the century": Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek The cause of problems which are, I claim, immanent to todays global capitalism, is projected onto an external intruder. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than thank you! The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. Who could? Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video Jordan B Peterson 6.5M subscribers Subscribe 86K 4.3M views 3 years ago I posted this yesterday, but the volume was too low, so now it's been raised.. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. Peterson El debate entre Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson posmodernismo. Not that I was disappointed. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. Im far from a simple social constructionism here. Slavoj iek on His Stubborn Attachment to Communism (Ep. 84 - BONUS) And what about foreign interventions in Iraq and Syria, or by our proxies like Saudi Arabia in Yemen? But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. No. Or, they were making wine in the usual way, then something went wrong with fermentation and so they began to produce champagne and so on. And we should act in a large scale, collective way. I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium The debate can best be seen as a collection of interesting ideas from both [12][13], The debate was divided into two thirty-minute introductions from each participant, followed by shorter ten-minute responses and time at the end for additional comments and answers to questions posed by the moderator, Stephen J. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. imblazintwo 4 yr. ago In the debate, Peterson and iek agreed on many issues, including a criticism of political correctness and identity politics. We often need a master figure to push us out an inertia and, Im not afraid to say, that forces us to be free. Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. I can see no threat to free creativity in this program on the contrary, I saw health care and education and so on as enabling me to focus my life on important creative issues. Did we really move too much in the direction of equality? To cite this article: Ania Lian (2019): The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and Happiness, The European Legacy, DOI: 10.1080/10848770.2019.1616901 El denominado "Debate del siglo" entre el filsofo y socilogo esloveno Slavoj iek y el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson, fue uno de los eventos intelectuales de mayor trascendencia del ltimo tiempo. Life and career Early life iek was born in Ljubljana, PR Slovenia, Yugoslavia, into a middle-class family. This Was An Interesting Debate. In our human universe, power, in the sense of exerting authority, is something much more mysterious, even irrational. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. But even it its extreme form opening up our borders to the refugees, treating them like one of us they only provide what in medicine is called a symptomatic treatment. Doctor Slavoj iek is as philosopher. Last nights sold-out debate between Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson at the Sony Centre was pitched as a no-holds-barred throw down . In fact, this was a surprise for many, but both men tended to agree a whole lot, For transcription of Zizeks first exposition (the actually coherent one I believe), I found that it had already been transcribed on Reddit during my own transcription so I integrated it into this one. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. talking about wherever he felt like that was tenuously related rather than Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. On april 19th, the debate was held and live streamed. The Fool and the Madman - Jacobin intellectuals). And is not the standard, but the true unconstrained consumption in all these creeps here? [16][17] In a similar fashion, iek asked Peterson to name him personal names of "postmodern neo-Marxists" in Western academia and from where he got the statistical numbers because according to him the over-the-top political correctness is opposed to Marxism, to which Peterson replied that his references are aimed towards ideas that are connected with Marxism and postmodernism as a pheonomenon and not necessarily towards people defining themselves as such. Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Facebook, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Twitter, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on LinkedIn, Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday, Slavoj iek vs Jordan Peterson Debate Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (Apr 2019), Why winning isnt the real purpose of arguing. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. Really? Zizek makes many interesting points. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer. consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise I crunched some numbers to find out", "Best academic steel-cage match ever? Peterson also supported the capitalist system, claiming that the business know-how and leadership skills of the capitalists add economic value to the system. Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. Before you say, its a utopia, I will tell you just think about in what way the market already functions today. The true opposite of egotist self-love is not altruism a concern for the common good but envy, resentment, which makes me act against my own interests. Believers call him God the Father. But can God be called a man? The second reaction is global capitalism with a human face think about socially responsible corporate figures like Bill Gates and George Soros. Billed as "The Debate of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". And I claim the same goes for tradition. [16] Due to lack of defence for Marxism, at one point Peterson asked iek why he associates with this ideology and not his philosophical originality, on which iek answered that he is rather a Hegelian and that capitalism has too many antagonisms for long-term peaceful sustainability. Hegels motto Evil resides in the gaze which sees evil everywhere fully applies here. The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. (PDF) Verfhrung - Kapitalismus - Academia.edu Jordan Peterson vs Slavoj Zizek was more a performance than a debate In the 1920s many Germans experienced their situation as a confused mess. It's quite interesting, but it's not The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . He's the sort of aging quitter we all hope to never be. [, : Thank you. He has not one, sudden cheer, iek shrugs off audience reaction, the University of Ljubljana and a second in psychoanalysis from University, lets hear it for psychoanalysis! The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. Therefore they retreat. of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". His12 Rules For Lifeis a global bestseller and his lectures and podcasts are followed by millions around the world. norswap The Zizek Peterson Debate Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. For example, an example not from neo-conservatives. The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. PDF The Debate between Slavoj iek and Jordan Peterson - CORE Email: mfedorovsky@gmail.com Resumen: La presente colaboracin es una resea sobre el debate llevado a cabo entre los intelectuales de izquierda y derecha, Just remember the outcry against my critique of LGBT+ ideology, and Im sure that if the leading figures were to be asked if I were fit to stand for them, they would turn in their graves even if they are still alive. In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton. Two Famous Academics, 3,000 Fans, $1,500 Tickets I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. The Church of England is debating if believers should stop using gendered language when talking about God. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. His Zizek vs Peterson: A Muslim Perspective - Berkeley Institute for El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. Now, let me be precise here Im well aware uncertain analysis and projections are in this domain. Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. this event had the possibility to reach a much wider audience. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. The paper contains a long digression about all the reasons the Soviet Union was terrible.